Horizon

Home/Resources/Comparisons/ Veylinx

Horizon and Veylinx: when each fits.

Veylinx measures willingness to pay with auctions in which participants bid with their own money. Horizon measures purchase or sign-up intent in the ad and on the offer page, in a familiar online environment.

Compared

Two behavioural methods, two situations.

Both measure behaviour instead of statements. The difference lies in the situation: a study flow with a bid or a buying situation in a familiar online environment.

Veylinx
Horizon
Approach
Auction in which participants bid with their own money, followed by questions
Painted door test with test design, implementation and data analysis by Horizon
Who responds
Participants selected for the study
Consumers in their familiar online environment, reached through Google and Meta ads, with no panel and no incentive
What is measured
Each participant's maximum willingness to pay
Purchase or sign-up intent per variant, from the ad to the confirmation
Situation
Short study flow, the product is shown directly
Familiar online environment: ad, offer page and competition for attention
Result
Demand curve and revenue-maximising price
Leading variant with statistical validation and cost per purchase intent
Typical use
Evaluating prices, concepts and ideas through willingness to pay, from consumer goods to subscriptions and apps
Concepts, value propositions, prices and target groups, also in insurance, energy and home appliances

Information on Veylinx is based on the provider's publicly available information. We are happy to include corrections.

Context

Where the approaches differ.

Price precision

An auction delivers a willingness to pay per person and therefore a demand curve. A price test compares set prices against each other.

Situation

The auction takes place in a study flow. The behavioural test takes place in the ad and on the offer page.

Breadth

An auction measures the value participants place on a product in money. A behavioural test compares variants of offer, value proposition, target group and price in the online environment.

Combination

Combining both approaches.

Step 1

Auction

Narrow down the price range and willingness to pay.

Step 2

Build variants

Set price and offer variants.

Step 3

Horizon

Test the variants in a realistic buying situation.

Step 4

Decision

With price curve and behavioural evidence.

More comparisons

Horizon compared with other providers.

Provider

Horizon and Appinio

Surveys via an app panel and a behavioural test in the online environment.

To the comparison

Provider

Horizon and quantilope

Automated survey methods and a behavioural test.

To the comparison

Provider

Horizon and Zappi

Standardised concept and ad tests and a behavioural test.

To the comparison

Provider

Horizon and Prelaunch

Reservations with a deposit and a behavioural test without payment.

To the comparison

Methods

Pretotyping compared with other methods.

Method

Pretotyping and Van Westendorp and Gabor-Granger

Stated willingness to pay or prices compared on behaviour.

To the comparison

Method

Pretotyping and conjoint

Weighting features in a survey or testing variants on behaviour.

To the comparison

Method

Pretotyping and surveys

Stated willingness to buy or measured purchase intent.

To the comparison
All comparisons

FAQ

Frequently asked questions.

Both measure behaviour. What is the difference?

The situation. An auction takes place in a study flow, a painted door test in the ad and on the offer page, in a familiar online environment.

horizon-vs-veylinx

Can Horizon determine exact price points?

Horizon compares set prices against each other, for example three price levels. The test does not deliver a full demand curve per person.

horizon-vs-veylinx

Is anything sold with Horizon?

No. No contract is concluded and no payment is taken. Anyone who chooses an offer is then told transparently that the offer is not yet available.

horizon-vs-veylinx

How long does a test take?

Around four weeks from question to data analysis, depending on the target group and the number of variants.

horizon-vs-veylinx

Which method fits your question?

Bring your decision question and we will show you which approach fits and how the two work together. Your insights team is welcome to join.

Daniel Putsche

You will speak with Daniel Putsche
Founder & CEO, 30 minutes

Read more

Thank you, we have your request.

We will get back to you within one working day with suggested times.

Close

Demo · Video

A complete test, from design to data analysis

Play the demo

Chapters: test design · offer pages · live data · result

Book a call

First call

Book a call

30 minutes, your decision question, a possible test design. No preparation needed on your side.

By submitting, you agree to the processing of your details to arrange a call. Details in our privacy policy.

Request a call
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
SAMPLE REPORTExample

Sample report: insurance

Data analysis · Test design · Metrics · Methodology

Sample report

Sample report: insurance

A complete results report with example values: research question, test design, purchase intent per variant and the data analysis.

12 pages, as a PDF to share internally
Free, download right after a short form
Note