


Value proposition testing means comparing different value propositions for the same offer at the same price, in order to find out which promise triggers purchase or sign-up intent and not just approval.
The value proposition determines what an offer stands for: faster, cheaper, safer, more sustainable, more convenient. There are often several good candidates, and a survey finds them all appealing.
The value proposition shapes product development, advertising, packaging and sales for years. A wrong choice rarely costs money in an immediately visible way, but it permanently lowers how many people choose an offer. This applies to new products as much as to repositioning an existing tariff or brand.
In surveys, promises that are appealing or socially desirable perform well, such as sustainability or provision for the future. At the moment of the offer, with price and alternatives, people often decide by other criteria. A test for liking therefore answers a different question than a test for purchase intent.
Methodologically, the value proposition test is sound if the variants differ only in the promise: same price, same product, same design, changed headline, benefit arguments and imagery. A difference in measured purchase intent can then be attributed to the promise.
The result has an effect beyond the individual offer. The winning promise sets the line for advertising, packaging, sales arguments and often for further product development as well: which features carry the promise, which can be dropped? The gap between the variants also shows how much depends on the choice of promise.
A manufacturer of a cordless kitchen machine tests three promises: "Freshly cooked in 20 minutes", "One appliance instead of five" and "Quiet enough for an open-plan kitchen". Price and appliance are identical in all variants. Around 2,200 visitors per variant reach the offer page. "One appliance instead of five" reaches 3.0 percent measured purchase intent, "Freshly cooked in 20 minutes" 2.1 percent, "Quiet" 1.4 percent. In a preceding survey, "Freshly cooked" was in the lead.
A claims test checks individual statements, often for advertising or packaging, and can be part of a value proposition test. The value proposition is the overarching promise that carries all elements of an offer. A concept test usually rates entire concepts on scales. A price test changes the price while the promise stays the same; the value proposition test changes the promise while the price stays the same.
A behavioural test shows which promise works at the moment of the offer, not why. Surveys or interviews explain the why better. It also measures the first decision, not whether the promise is fulfilled in everyday life. And it requires the variants to be cleanly isolated: if they also differ in image, length or design, the finding is hard to attribute. Which statements are legally permissible, for example for environmental claims, is clarified by the legal department.
Horizon tests value propositions in the Painted Door Test with realistic offer pages and up to six variants. Nothing is sold.
Webb & Sheeran 2006: 47 experiments: a medium-to-large change in intention (d = 0.66) produces only a small-to-medium change in behaviour (d = 0.36). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence, Psychological Bulletin. Source
Up to six, provided each variant gets enough visitors. Three or four usually make sense.
Price, product and design. Only the promise and the arguments for it change.
Liking and choice often diverge. A behavioural test measures which promise gets chosen when price and alternatives are visible.
Bring your decision question, and we will outline a possible test design.
You will speak with Daniel Putsche
Founder & CEO, 30 minutes
Read more